rank-math
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/teachbytes/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
\n<\/p>\n
MADISON, Wis. (AP) \u2014 A conservative prosecutor is asking a judge to toss out Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul\u2019s lawsuit challenging Wisconsin\u2019s 173-year-old ban on abortions, arguing that it lacks legal merit and that there is no weight to assertions that it is unenforceable because of its age.<\/p>\n
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski filed a motion late Wednesday to dismiss the case. His fellow defendants, Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne and Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, filed briefs preserving their rights to seek a dismissal as the case progresses. All three argued that the lawsuit seeks to improperly restrict prosecutorial discretion and that Kaul lacks standing to sue because he hasn\u2019t been personally harmed by the ban.<\/p>\n
Urmanski, the only Republican among the three, went further, rejecting Kaul’s argument that the ban is so old that it can no longer be considered to have passed with the consent of the people.<\/p>\n
\u201cWisconsin courts have never recognized that a statute can lose effect through disuse and, even if they had, this case would not warrant application of that principle,\u201d Urmanski’s motion said. \u201cIf the Plaintiffs believe the statute lacks the consent of the governed, their appeal should be to the Legislature and the Governor to seek changes in the law, not this Court.\u201d<\/p>\n
Kaul spokesperson Gillian Drummond didn’t immediately respond to a message Thursday seeking comment. Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper has given all the parties in the case until Feb. 6 to file briefs expanding on their stances.<\/p>\n
The case appears destined to end up before the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Conservative justices hold a one-vote majority on the court, but Democrats are banking on a progressive candidate winning the seat of retiring Justice Patience Roggensack in April\u2019s election, giving liberals the edge. The longer the case drags on in the lower courts, the more likely it will come before the Supreme Court<\/a> after the new justice takes the bench in August.<\/p>\n